There were parts of the story of this horrific incident that didn't make sense to me. Right when the police and investigators got to the house, they should have gone in and arrested the men. Getting to the house and "setting up" the perimeter before doing anything else gave the men extra time to kill the victims and distribute the gas to light the house on fire. In my opinion, the burning down of the house could have been prevented if the police were more aggressive when at the house. I think the process and precedure for investiagting crimes like these should involve paying close attention to detail and finding any possible evidence to use against the suspects. In regards to what information to give to the public, it is hard to draw the line of releasing too much and not enough. I would think the family of the victims would want some privacy, but that is hard when its a story as big as this one. I think the police could have released more informtation to the public than they did but not too much. As outsiders, its also hard to account for the lack of continuity between those in charge of the investigation. I know I was confused as to why it took them so long to take action and I'm sure I'm not the only one. I guess we just have to live with the way they handled the situation and hope they learned to do more next time.
1. Do you think the police did enough when they got to the home?
2. If you were the victim's family would you have wanted more information to be given to the public?
3. Do you approve of the men getting the death penalty?
No comments:
Post a Comment